martes, 26 de marzo de 2013

OWA(MLM p M).- If bureaucratic capitalism wouldown merely one leg…! And this is what (however denying) UOC (Colombia) stands for!!!



 انقلاب زنده باد
Semi-feudal and Semi colonial/colonial arrangement gives rise to imperialist “creativity” which generates bureaucratic capitalism in oppressed countries. So, bureaucratic capitalism walks with two legs: semi-feudalism+ semi colonial/colonial. Imperialism is its evil soul or its pumping heart.

One cannot merely walk with one leg, and if ever is willing to make a “walk”, that is only a staggering.

Such is the situation of those analyzes who uphold that: Venezuela, is a semi colony, but, does not uphold its semi feudal character, and “denies” it in favor of pretending it a capitalist country. They try to do this, and they do this to fight Maoist thesis on “Bureaucratic Capitalism”

Genuine Maoists always have argued that: if ever there has not still occurred a transformation towards a New Democratic Revolution, then the conclusion is nothing but a bureaucratic capitalism, which is fascist corporatist in character. This is what Chairman Gonzalo and the various documents of PCP teach, and this is what Chairman Siraj Sikder thought in Bangladesh, and what Comrade Charu Mazumdar taught in India. In our own case, in Afghanistan, Chairman Akram Yari had also taken the genuine Maoist stand on bureaucratic capitalism, and had pointed out its fascist corporativist character. We see much more similarity between Gonzalo’s teaching and Comrade Akram Yari’s Thought. Let us see how Chairman Akram Yari puts the issue forward:

“Will the development of such a corrupt and degenerated capitalism {the bureaucratic “capitalism} which comes from the situation of world imperialism, triumph over feudalism in the “long run? Is imperialism able to grow its Embryo (the capitalism) in this form in this country (in “Afghanistan)? {Without relying on a corrupt form, which is bureaucratic capitalism}
“The answer to this question, according to our stand, is absolutely negative! First, the development and “growth of free market capitalism, which plays a second role in such a circumstance, is prone to defeat “in international situation of imperialist capitalism. This comes from greedy tendencies and hegemonic “expansionism of imperialism, especially social-imperialism which creates obstacles and prevents the “development of this domestic capitalist class {the national bourgeoisie}. Secondly, the growth and “development of bureaucratic capitalism which is mixed with oppression, disarrangements and feudal “discriminations, and contaminated with corruptions, hierarchy of privileges, and at the same time, “fascist religious dictatorship is also inseparably annexed to it( to bureaucratic capitalism), and is the “only form which has emerged in all countries under the domination of capitalism{ imperialist},  in such “a degenerated form{ which is bureaucratic capitalism}, and this not only does not develop capitalism in “such countries, but rather it reinforces and strengthens the remnants of feudalism, and is instrumental “to save feudalism within its boundaries, and by such a {degenerated development of capitalism} it “keeps the imperialist world market stable. So, the thing which imperialist market place brings to such “countries, which calls it “modernization” is a corrupt half-tailed capitalism, which is rotten and “degenerated rather than progressive, and is older than anyone can assume { and this is contrary to the “claims of its apologies who argue for its modern character}, and this is more than its “modern” “character, relying on rotten and old {prerequisites and old infra and supra structure}.”

Comrade Lenin, even in 1905, in his famous and important book: two tactics of social democracy in Democratic Revolution had already formulated that the proletariat is more hurt by an undeveloped and under developed capitalism rather than by a developed one. So, a deformed or an “ill mannered” capitalism, which is scientifically called a bureaucratic capitalism, is a “capitalism” that imperialism raises on very foundations of a rotten feudalist infra-structure. Such “capitalism” is fierce than a market capitalist enemy of classical western style. Such a “capitalist” country exploits the workers and the peasantry much fiercer.
After great Lenin,  it was Chairman Mao, who formulated the thesis on bureaucratic capitalism, which explains how under direct hegemony of imperialist capitalism, there would be no space for a sound capitalist growth for those countries who have not seen a bourgeois-democratic revolution yet. So, a degenerated “capitalism” generates in such countries, under hegemony of imperialism and this ill-mannered and degenerated “capitalism” merely serves world imperialism and its monsters.

Chairman Gonzalo found out that this very thesis of Chairman Mao is of a very significant importance, and is vital to analyze the situation in most of the Asian, Latin American and African countries.

So, a Maoist scientific tradition of analysis was fully developed within the framework of Gonzalo Thought. Like Chairman Gonzalo, Comrade Akram Yari also says that:

“only form which has emerged in all countries under the domination of capitalism {imperialist}, in such “a degenerated form {which is bureaucratic capitalism}, and this not only does not develop capitalism in “such countries, but rather it reinforces and strengthens the remnants of feudalism, and is instrumental “to save feudalism within its boundaries, and by such a {degenerated development of capitalism} it “keeps the imperialist world market stable. “

Our organization (Organization of the workers of Afghanistan) upholds the very scientific analysis of classical MLM which still bears validity under current world circumstances. We believe that: any deviation from this very analysis inevitably pushes us towards abandoning the strategy of PPW as universal. So, when we analyze the situation of a country like Venezuela, it is not possible to escape from analyzing and introducing its class structure, which is semi-feudal. It is not sufficient to argue merely its semi- colonial status. Such a narrow minded analysis, which UOC (Colombia) has recently upheld, is only in favor of abandoning the very Maoist thesis of bureaucratic Capitalism. Why has this organization taken such an erroneous stand? Because, he thinks that: upholding, defending and applying the Maoist analysis of bureaucratic capitalism may also infect their analysis of class nature of Colombian revolution.Therefore, they have gone toward denial of this very Maoist thesis that has a full scope of validity.

Colombian comrades can develop and defend their analysis of class nature of their country,(whether their analysis be true or false), but they are not in authority to abandon a Maoist foundation, the very thesis of bureaucratic capitalism on behalf of saving their own analysis of Colombia, as a capitalist country. Such an analysis would make them deviate towards an opportunistic trend, which reconciles them with Hoxaist analysis of countries like Venezuela. Any deviation from classic MLM on this issue creates revisionism in the long run. So, we ask Colombian comrades to revise their non-Maoist and subjectivist stand.

What is the source of illusion for Colombian comrades so that they have replaced “advanced” bureaucratic capitalist states with capitalist state and have called them capitalist? (And consequently, as the Hoxaists do, they are also inevitable preaching a socialist revolution for such countries)

According to presidente Gonzalo, when bureaucratic capitalism more develops and ripens, it transforms as monopoly state capitalism (and still bureaucratic in nature), and this paves the way to New Democratic Revolution. Colombian comrades (and so the Guevarists and Hoxaists) do not see this. Instead, they assume such ripen bureaucratic capitalist countries, as being capitalist. This comes from their “walking with one leg” analysis of such countries. Some comrades have called such analysis as being such “ a glass half full half empty” as Colombian comrades see the semi colonial state of Venezuela, but they fail to see semi feudalism, and this “not seeing” comes from a denial of bureaucratic capitalism by Colombian comrades. Such an analysis of “a glass half full half empty”, in one side, denounces Chavez, but it cannot fully expose it as fascist based in analysis of bureaucratic capitalism as fascistic and corporatist. So, such a denounce lacks a firm reasoning.

Colombian comrades announce that: the blind glare of the reforms blinds and take away the people from the path of revolution”, but these comrades cannot prove it how and why such “blind glare of reforms” takes away the people from the path of revolution. But genuine Maoism ways that: reforms are obstacles that prevent the masses going toward people’s war, and these reforms only strengthen the bureaucratic capitalist state, and does not allow the masses to think out a revolutionary path, a path toward New Democratic Revolutionary, by waging protracted people’s war, smashing old state of bureaucratic capitalists, and establish the new power. So, denying bureaucratic capitalism is nothing more than reaffirming oneself in old state. Indeed, indirectly, Colombian comrades, have sided the apologists of old order in have taken stand in favor of bureaucratic capitalism (however by formally “denying” the very phenomena of bureaucratic capitalism”).

Colombian comrades claim that:“In fact the “Bolivarian revolution” has left intact the old bourgeois state and the old social relations, and intact the relationship of dependence on imperialism, even towards American imperialism, which still has the privilege of the exploitation and the trade of oil. The “imperialist” and “anti-capitalist” speech of “XXI century socialism” is verbiage to fool the labor movement and, in that sense, it is wrong that the Communists join their coryphaei, when their duty is to expose them and fight them as false socialist and communists.”

If such a bourgeois ( and not a bureaucratic capitalist) state really exists in Venezuela, and still is “intact”, then how such an “intact” bourgeois state, however in an “intact relationship of dependence on imperialism, even towards American imperialism”, still is not a bureaucratic and comprador in essence? This is where the reasoning of Colombian comrades ceases to exist. Paradoxically they claim for a bourgeois state, in Venezuela (assuming by them not to be a bureaucratic capitalist state), but still claiming that: that state is dependent to imperialism, even to Yanki imperialism! Why such paradoxical paradigm is has been put forward by Colombian comrades? It is because that they see the trees but they do not see the forest. They see the “dependence of bourgeois state of Venezuela to imperialism” but still they do not see it as “bureaucratic capitalist comprador state”. This is the weak point of UOC which has pushed it backward toward abandoning a correct line.

Here, UOC finds common language with Hoxaists and Collective Odio De Clase who claim that: Chavez is a bourgeois reformist. UOC (Colombia) also calls him a bourgeois reformist. But still Colombians are ahead and many steps forward than Communist Party of Philippines who has falsely argued that: Chavez is a champion of the Venezuelan masses.

UOC formulates Chavis “socialism” as nationalism+ Bolivarism. What is the meaning of such a claim? It means that: contrary to Chairman Mao’s analysis, imposing Kemalist modeling, there still can be a bourgeois state in oppressed countries, which may not be a bureaucratic state. Such a conclusion, opposes the very formulation of New Democratic Revolution, as part of world proletarian revolution, a formulation which is one of the most brilliant achievements of Chairman Mao Tse Tung for oppressed people of the world.

UOC (Colombia) truly says:” Neither the “Bolivarian Revolution” in Venezuela, nor the “Citizens' Revolution” in Ecuador, neither the “Sandinista” one in Nicaragua, nor their counterparts in other countries, can break the chains that enslave the toiling masses to exploitation and to the dictatorship of the exploiters. All these deceptions reformists are as worst as the others bourgeois regimes like Santos in Colombia Santos or Piñera in Chile. All are essentially a class dictatorship of the exploiters over the exploited.” But still this organization, has not asked from himself why such organizations mentioned in above piece, are not able to “break the chains that enslave the toiling masses”? it is because, that such organizations are the representatives of reactionary old state of bureaucratic capitalists. If they were the representative of progressive bourgeoisie, there would be no need for New Democracy. New Democratic State, only necessitates when bureaucratic capitalism, as the only form of a “capitalist” hegemony in oppressed countries, rules. This is what Chairman Mao says. Neglecting this very point, means falling to Kemalism. If UOC (Colombia) truly believes that Venezuela is an old reactionary state, then it cannot be a bourgeois reformist.  Bourgeoisie in oppressed countries, according to Mao, is never able to lead the masses, is not able to come to power. According to Maoism, it is merely a bureaucratic bourgeoisie, which leads the bureaucratic capitalism, which “leads” the masses, but towards subjugation to imperialism, and in reconciliation with remnants of feudalism. So, this “bourgeoisie” is part of old state, the bureaucratic state of a comprador arrangement.

Maoism says that: in this epoch of imperialism and proletarian revolutions, bourgeoisie no more reforms and it is only bureaucratic capitalism, which through fascist pragmatism, claims “reforms” to prevent the people’s war and the genesis of new state of oppressed masses.

At the end of its recent document, UOC (Colombia) concludes that: only the people can save the people. Here to, these comrades “forget” to explain that: to save the people from ills of old state, which, according to MLM cannot be but a bureaucratic capitalist state!
Organization of the workers of Afghanistan (MLM-p-M)
3/24/13

4 comentarios:

  1. el revisionismo, se autodenomina comunista, y mas aun marxista leninistas maoistas, y en la practica, niegan a mao prostituyen la ideologia y siembran ideas burguesas en el seno del pueblo, eso es lo que son en la prectica el colectivo odio de clase y la union obrera comunista, ellos estan contra la tesis maoista del capitalismo burocratico, aplicada por el presidente gonzalo, estan en contra del culto a la personalidad, para irse contra la direccion del partido que son los jefes y la jefatura, es decir estan en contra del centralismo democratico, ellos hablan de de guerra popular, para oportunistamente montarse sobre las guerras populares de india y de filipinas, pero no dicen nada sobre la guerra popular del peru que esta cerca en el caso de UOC, y que bien enterados estan de la guerra popular en la india y filipinas, y peor aun no toman posicion de algunos planteamiento que estan contra los principios del proletariado de dichos partidos que dirigen guerra popular, y que los puede llevar a la capitulacion y al cretinismo parlamentario como sucedio en nepal... como lo hace el partido comunista del peru, pues este entiende que es de esta manera que se depura al revisionismo que esta dentro de esos partidos, y asi se ayuda a ellos a curarse del revisionismo, pero para estos senores eso es antagonizar con dichos partidos, simplemente el partido comunista del peru apoya a todas las organizaciones y partidos comunistas que desarrollan guerra popular y a las que estan por iniciar pero a la vez les hace criticas que estan en contra de los principios del proletariado.
    en cambio el revisionismo se monta sobre esas luchas de los pueblos de la india y filipinas dirigidos por sus partidos comunistas, pero que no son capaces ni siquiera de oreganizar un partido, y peor aun pensar en iniciar guerra popular....es es lo que se ve y se sienten ofendidos, atacados, cuando uno discrepa con ellos, e insultan y no debaten no ven principios para plantear sus posiciones, demostrando que en su cabezas estan llenas de ideologia burguesa, por eso es que no tienen posicion de clase proletario, son simples intelectualides de la burguesia en el seno del proletariado.
    SERIA BUENO QUE MAOISMO LINEA ROJA PUBLIQUE LA ENTREVISTA DEL PRESIDENTE GONZALO PARA QUE LOS PUEBLOS DEL MUNDO VEAN LUZ Y PUEDAN ACLARAR SU CONCIENCIA DE CLASE
    http://www.solrojo.org/pcp_doc/pcp_0688.htm
    VIVA EL MAOISMO, ABAJO EL REVISIONISMO!

    ResponderEliminar
  2. Seria bueno que esten en castellano porque no se entiende

    ResponderEliminar
  3. NOTAS PARA TIPIFICACION DEL RÉGIMEN COMO FASCISMO: Demostración Política.


    El 5 de abril del 92 se dió un golpe de Estado. Allí había comenzado a aplicarse un plan contrarrevolucionário que estaría previsto para durar XX años (Revista 0iga Nro. 647 y 648, jul. 93).

    En el fondo es una concepción fascista pero, adaptada a las condiciones de combatir una guerra popular (es muy importante tener presente la experiencia china y la aplicación del fascismo por Chiang Kai Shek). Un plan asesorado y avalado por el imperialismo principalmente yanqui y puesto en ejecución por las fuerzas armadas. Velasco es un antecedente. El Apra también. Y este fascismo no se contrapone a la centralización absoluta sino que se complementan. Es un fascismo vergonzante. Hoy está más claro, ver discurso de Fujimori del 28 de julio del 95, "Gerencia del Estado directa, eficaz y permanente", democracia economica", "nuevo nacionalismo", "modernización", "queremos ser modernos", (Chiang Kai Shek); "Estado moderno", "grandes reformas estructurales ", "Cruzada educativa", "nuevo marco de legalidad", ''ni populismo ni ultraliberalismo, ni izquierda ni derecha", ni capitalismo", "Es el Estado donde se defiende el principio de autoridad", "reforma del Poder Judicial", por fin tenemos la capacidad de planificar metas y objetivos a largo plazo", "lograr el renacimiento del Perú en el nuevo milenio".

    Medidas con el parlamento (derrotero). Hoy, un parlamento manejado a su antojo. Poder Judicial, Poder Electoral (Elecciónes y fraude), (en todo estos puntos el Apra se quedó corto y ya era fascista). Constitución violada. Nueva Constitución vigente violada.

    - Legislación. Ley Antiterrorista peor que la del Apra. Tribunales Militares. Tribunales sin rostro. Tribunales Especiales. Cadena perpetua. Negación del derecho de defensa, durante dos años siguió ley que condenaba a menores de edad como si fueran adultos. Condenas con reo ausente. Leyes retroactivas.
    - Frente a derechos sindicales y del pueblo: negación completa.
    - Universidades militarizadas y en "reorganización".
    - Municipalidades: recortadas.
    - Economía: Del fascismo de Pinochet y liberalismo. Con Velasco impulsaron el monopolio estatal, hoy impulsan el monopolio particular y eso no se contrapone al fascismo.
    - Orgánicamente: En el campo es donde se expresa nítidamente la corporativización.
    - Ver ley de "rondas" y su armamento.

    continua abajo........

    ResponderEliminar
  4. Analizar táctica que sigue. Desarrolla la del APRA. (ver documento: "Desarrollar la guerra popular sirviendo a la revolución mundial". pags. 108-109) Del punto II UN AÑO DE GOBIERNO APRISTA "El APRA bajo dirección de García Pérez ha seguido la estrategia de apoyarse en las masas pobres de los pueblos jóvenes, ganarse al campesinado serrano, especialmente del llamado "Trapecio Andino", atar la lucha del pueblo usando especialmente a la IU como furgón de cola y uniendo a toda la reacción bajo su mando, aislar al proletariado, golpear a las masas populares y apuntar contra la guerra popular, contando para esto con el uso de la represión a cargo de las fuerzas armadas y policiales. Hoy esta estrategia se reforzará enarbolando más demagógicamente sus falsedades de "Estado nacionalista, democrático y popular" y un más altisonante antiimperialismo verbal".

    Además, ver el manejo del Ministerio de la Presidencia CONADE, FONCODES, PRONAA, Comités de Desarrollo, (ejército peruano), etc.

    Estado policiaco: Además del incremento de la FF.AA. y FF.PP., y del impulso del SIN (tenían propuesta de crear oficinas del SIN en cada ministerio). Serenazgo. "Seguridad ciudadana".

    Reelección del 95, y plan de reelegirse. Detrás Hermoza y la camarilla de las fuerzas armadas.

    (Ver también) Sobre Comentarios Acerca del Golpe de Estado. Abril 92, segundo párrafo. Dos tendencias en el V.E.: una tendencia fascista y la otra demoliberal..., ahí se plantea como Fujimori está en contra del parlamento..., partidos tradicionales, etc.

    Y discurso de Fujimori: "Estado moderno"... sería en base a lo que decía Chiang Kai Shek. (Tomo III P. Mao. En notas pag. 278 "Sobre el gobierno de Coalicion"). El 1ro. de agosto 1932 promulgó para el campo el "reglamento para la organización de los pao y chiao y para el censo de la población en los distritos y provincias", decía era un sistema administrativo de base con el que la camarilla reaccionaria del Kuomintang imponía su dominación fascista.

    Aquí ver Ley de Comunidades sería bueno ver fecha en que se dió la ley… pero, la manera como estan organizando al campesinado, es fascista... similitudes y diferencias a la época del 68 con Velasco, no van a repetir igual pero, en el fondo es fascista; trata de aparentar como demoliberal pero se ha decidido por el fascismo.

    Ver Torno II P. Mao pag. 52… centralismo absoluto… Hay que revisar toda la legislación de Fujimori; lo que quieren es confundir con eso de democracia directa… el gobierno actual es fascista pero, con ropaje demoliberal. En los hechos, en el campo ya está ese sistema fascista, ver el último doc. También el de !Superar… ¡.

    En ciudades. Un Estado policiaco, en otras palabras, es un Estado fascista esto lo dijo incluso un hijo del imperialismo… Nosotros no somos inventores de la pólvora lo que dijo el PG: La segunda mitad de cada década se agrava sus crisis, se cumple de pe a pa, hay una crisis grave pero se ha juntado dos décadas la del 80 y la del 90…, qué dijeron en diciembre sobre el crecimiento negativo y el mes que seguía se eleva la inflación…necesitan invertir mas...

    ……….....………

    ……….....……...

    ……….....………

    Febrero, 1996 COMITE CENTRAL
    PARTIDO COMUNISTA DEL PERU


    ResponderEliminar